If you're one of the few who have read my last entry from too many months ago. The thesis goes like this:
Government has a specific role, and that role ends somewhere before being the solution to every argument we have. Just because something is legal, that does not make it moral. Inviting the Government into this solution for the Pro-Life crowd only makes things worse, and Hanna Rosin's column from today's Slate shows the most glaring example why.
My liberalism for medical "rights" unfortunately has to encompass the barbarism of abortion. It is an ambiguity that does not have a legal remedy. But, Ms. Rosin, my goodness... is there no room for discretion in this debate?
Not if you need sanctification.
As a libertarian, I believe every living being has a moral right to the course of its natural life, including a fetus. Just because you can have an abortion, that does not mean you should, even if your pregnancy is inconvenient.
I had a huge case of writer's block for most of 2014. Nothing really motivated me to write. Until today.
Rosin's work is vile. I can see why sanctification would bring relief. I posted it because it should be viewed, understood, and scorned.
We must find peace in this debate.
Are we really this dark?
No comments:
Post a Comment